Infosys logo

Infosys share news, announcements and annual reports

NSE: INFYBSE: 500209IT - SoftwareLarge Cap

Infosys Limited · Formerly Infosys Technologies · Face value ₹5 · Listed Jun 1993 on BSE, Feb 1995 on NSE
Last close ₹1,123.15down ₹39.85 (3.43%)BSE ₹1,123.15

Share price at the NSE close on 28 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹1,163.00.

28 Oct: open ₹1,130.00, high ₹1,133.80, low ₹1,103.40

52-week range of traded prices to 28 Oct 2026
₹980.40Low, 29 Sep 2026₹1,728.00High, 3 Feb 2026
Market cap
₹4,55,805 Cr9th largest listed
P/E
14.82
P/B
4.60
Dividend yield
2.23%
ROE
30.4%
ROCE
39.9%
Debt to equity
0.00
Volume, NSE
1,56,36,44950.5% delivered

Infosys disputes and clarifications

42 filed, newest first.

  1. Jul 2025

  2. Jun 2025

    • 2 Jun · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from Infosys Limited for the quarter ended 31-Mar-2025 with respect to Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. On basis of above the Company is required to clarify the following: -1. Financial results submitted is not as per format prescribed by SEBI -2. Limited Review Report/ Independent Auditor's Report is not in the format prescribed by SEBI The response of the Company is awaited.
  3. Mar 2025

  4. Dec 2024

  5. Oct 2024

  6. Sep 2024

  7. Nov 2019

  8. Oct 2019

    • 24 Oct · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from the Company on October 22, 2019 regarding disclosures under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements), 2015 with reference to whistleblower complaints disclosed by the Company on October 22, 2019. Infosys Limited has now replied to the Exchange stating that "Consistent with Company's practice and whistleblower policy, complaints are presented to the audit committee of the Board and thoroughly reviewed and appropriately dealt with. While dealing with these complaints, the Company evaluates the requirements of various regulations including disclosures under Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, as amended ( LODR Regulations ). As disclosed in the Company s stock exchange filings made on October 22, 2019, the anonymous whistleblower complaints have been placed before the audit committee who has retained the law firm of Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. to conduct an independent investigation. Before conclusion of the investigation of the generalized allegations in the complaints, a disclosure under Regulation 30 of LODR Regulations was not required. The disclosure made on October 22, 2019 was to respond to multiple media inquiries and reports. The Company undertakes to continue making timely disclosures as required under Regulation 30 of LODR Regulations".
  9. Dec 2018

  10. May 2018

  11. Apr 2018

    • 16 Apr · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captionedWhistleblower allegations unfounded: ShawIn this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
  12. Mar 2018

    • 8 Mar · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned Infy, I-T Officials under CBI Scanner. The response from the Company received as below-. We have taken note of the media articles in relation to the alleged fraud concerning the Income Tax department and the First Information report ( FIR) by the Central Bureau of Investigation ( CBI) in relation to these allegations. Infosys Limited is not named as an accused party in the said FIR. So far we have not been contacted by the CBI in connection with this matter. Infosys will co-operate with law enforcement agencies as and when we are approached. As per our obligations under the SEBI Listing Regulations and the Company's Disclosure Policy Infosys will make appropriate disclosures.
    • 5 Mar · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned -Infy, I-T Officials under CBI ScannerIn this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
  13. Sep 2017

    • 19 Sep · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "Infosys Senior VP, Design Thinking head Sanjay Rajagopalan quits."The response of the Company is:"We refer to your email dated September 18, 2017. In this regard, we would like to clarify that Mr. Sanjay Rajagopalan s (Senior Vice President, Head Design & Research) last date of employment with Infosys was September 13, 2017. Mr. Rajagopalan was not a Key Managerial Personnel of the Company and as such there was no requirement to intimate the stock exchanges as per regulation 30 of the SEBI Listing Regulations. This is also not a material information and does not have any bearing on the operations of the Company. Further, please note that the Company will continue to adhere to all applicable regulations."
    • 18 Sep · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "Infosys Senior VP, Design Thinking head Sanjay Rajagopalan quits." In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
  14. Aug 2017

    • 31 Aug · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "Idea LIC to seek briefing on Infy Strategy". In this regard, the Company has vide email dated August 30, 2017 informed the Exchange that no meeting was scheduled with LIC to discuss any of the matters.
    • 30 Aug · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "Idea LIC to seek briefing on Infy Strategy". In this regard, the Company is expected that as required under Regulation 30 of LODR, if this briefing meeting is scheduled to be held with LIC, advance notice will be filed with NSE for dissemination to the public and also promptly after the meeting, the information/briefing given to LIC will be filed with NSE for dissemination on its website.
  15. Jun 2017

  16. Feb 2017

  17. Jun 2015

    • 12 Jun · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "TCS, Infosys face US probe for H-1B visa violations". The Company has clarified that "The company has not received any notification or intimation w.r.t. H-1B visa violations" also stated that "Infosys is committed to complying with U.S. immigration laws. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regularly selects a percentage of visa and labor condition applications for extra scrutiny in this industry, and we work closely with the DOL to assist them in this activity in the ordinary course of our business. We have received no indication of any broader investigation of Infosys visa practices".
    • 12 Jun · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "TCS, Infosys face US probe for H-1B visa violations". The Company has clarified that "The company has not received any notification or intimation w.r.t. H-1B visa violations".
    • 12 Jun · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "TCS, Infosys face US probe for H-1B visa violations". In this regard, the Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following : Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The reply from the Company is awaited.
  18. Feb 2015

    • 24 Feb · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Infosys to provide outsourcing services to Dutch insurance company". The Company has clarified as follows: 1. Infosys BPO Limited, a majority owned and controlled subsidiary of Infosys Limited has entered in to a contract with a.s.r, a leading Dutch insurance company to supply back office services with effect from April 1, 2015. 2. The company has examined this contract from the shareholders perspective and clause 36 of the listing agreement and of the opinion that the revenues from this contract will not materially impact the operation/ performance of the company. While assessing the materiality the company has examined the following quantitative and qualitative factors- a) The consideration involved in the transaction as a percentage of Infosys Limited s annual revenues. b) Whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of business. c) Whether a related party is involved in the transaction. d) Whether the transaction represent a significant shift in strategy. e) Whether the transaction is an exit from or entry into a significant line of business. f) Whether the transaction causes a shift in the board or senior management of Infosys Limited.
    • 24 Feb · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to an announcement dated February 16, 2015 regarding press release titled Infosys to Acquire Panaya, a Leading Provider of Automation Technology . The Company vide email dated February 24, 2015 has clarified as under; 1. There are no promoter/ promoter group/ group companies having any interest in the entity being acquired. 2. The acquisition will not fall within the scope of related party transactions. 3. Panaya, Inc., is a leading provider of automation technology for large scale enterprise software management. The company has assessed this acquisition and examined the impact on the performance on the operations of the company from the shareholder s perspective and clause 36 perspective . The company is of the view that the acquisition is not material and believe that the information such as history of last 3 years turnover, country in which the acquired entity has presence , etc is not important in making an investment decision, While assessing the materiality the company has reviewed a variety of information including the following quantitative and qualitative factors: a) The consideration involved in the transaction as a percentage of Infosys annual revenue b) The total consideration as a percentage of our fixed assets and as a percentage of our total assets c) Whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of business d) Whether a related party is involved in the transaction e) Whether the transaction represent a significant shift in strategy f) Whether the transaction is an exit from or entry into a significant line of business Whether the transaction causes a shift in the board or senior management of Infosys Limited.
    • 18 Feb · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to an announcement dated February 16, 2015 regarding press release titled Infosys to Acquire Panaya, a Leading Provider of Automation Technology . On Basis of above the Company is required to clarify on the following points; a) Whether the promoter/ promoter group/ group companies have any interest in the entity being acquired? If yes, nature of interest and details thereof; b) Whether the acquisition would fall within related party transactions? If yes, whether the same is done at arm s length; C) Brief background about the entity acquired in terms of products/line of business acquired, date of incorporation, history of last 3 years turnover, country in which the acquired entity has presence and any other significant information (in brief); Reply from the Company is awaited.
    • 6 Feb · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to recent new item captioned "Infosys to provide outsourcing services to Dutch insurance company". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
  19. Oct 2014

    • 20 Oct · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Infosys violated SEZ rules at Chandigarh tech park, says revenue department report". The Company has clarified that "We have not issued any press release on this subject. Indian Express sent us a query on this subject and we issued our comments. The company has denied any wrong doing. We don't consider this event as a material event and this has no impact on the operations or performance of the company".
  20. Jun 2014

    • 12 Jun · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Infy stocks zoom 3.6% on share buyback buzz". The Company has clarified that "This is a speculative news. Hence, we deny this news and rumour".
  21. Feb 2014

    • 27 Feb · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Infosys hiving off PPS as a subsidiary; Finacle not part of it". Infosys Limited has clarified that "the article was not based on any discussions with the company. However, it is indeed a fact that we are in the process of forming a new subsidiary for our products and platforms business and we will be happy to share the specific details once it is formed. Finacle will not be part of this subsidiary. We have created subsidiaries in the past as well to help us better serve our client needs. Our effort to create a subsidiary for our products and platforms business is an operational matter and is being pursued to help us deliver better value to our clients."
  22. Jan 2014

    • 14 Jan · Legal

      Exchange had sought clarification from Infosys Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Infosys might make Finacle separate subsidiary in de-merger plan". Infosys Limited has clarified that "Finacle is headed by Haragopal and the oversight is provided by our Executive Vice Chairman, Kris Gopalakrishnan. As of date it continues to operate as a unit of Infosys".