Reliance Industries share news, announcements and annual reports
NSE: RELIANCEBSE: 500325Petroleum ProductsLarge Cap
Reliance Industries Limited · Face value ₹10 Face value. The nominal value of one share as the company issued it, the unit its share capital is counted in and a dividend can be stated as a percentage of; it has no link to the share price. Face value in the glossary · Listed Jan 1978 on BSE, Nov 1995 on NSE
Last close ₹1,164.90down ₹2.50 (0.21%)BSE ₹1,163.55
Share price at the NSE close on 30 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹1,167.40.
30 Oct: open ₹1,170.40, high ₹1,174.60, low ₹1,152.50
52-week range of traded prices to 30 Oct 2026
₹1,152.20Low, 13 Oct 2026₹1,611.80High, 5 Jan 2026
- Market capMarket capitalisation. Share price times the number of shares: what the whole company is worth at the day's price. The rank is by average market value over the six months to Jun 2026, among listed companies. Market capitalisation: how it is worked out
- ₹15,76,405 Cr1st largest listed
- P/EPrice to earnings, trailing. Market cap divided by the profit of the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, after the share of the other owners of its subsidiaries: what investors pay for each rupee of a year's profit. Price to earnings, trailing: how it is worked out
- 19.20
- P/BPrice to book. Market cap divided by the net worth that belongs to the company's own shareholders, its assets less everything it owes and less the other owners' share of its subsidiaries, on its latest balance sheet. Price to book: how it is worked out
- 1.67
- Dividend yieldDividend yield. Dividends paid per share in the twelve months to the day, as a percentage of the day's share price.
- 0.52%
- ROEReturn on equity. Profit over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, as a percentage of their net worth, the money they have in the business. Net worth is the average of the latest balance sheet and the one a year before it.
- 9.0%
- ROCEReturn on capital employed. Operating profit after depreciation (revenue less operating expenses and depreciation, without other income and one-off items) as a percentage of all the money the business runs on: the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included, plus borrowings. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. The profit is over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly); net worth and borrowings are on the latest balance sheet.
- 8.9%
- Debt to equityDebt to equity. Borrowings divided by the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included: rupees borrowed for each rupee of equity in the business. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. From the balance sheet at the end of Sep 2026.
- 0.34
- Volume, NSEVolume. Shares traded on the last trading day; delivery is the part buyers kept rather than sold again the same day. Volume in the glossary
- 1,47,53,65054.7% delivered
Reliance Industries disputes and clarifications
75 filed, newest first. Page 1 of 2.
Oct 2026
Mar 2026
Dec 2025
4 Dec · Legal
Nov 2025
May 2025
Apr 2025
Mar 2025
4 Mar · Legal
Feb 2025
15 Feb · Legal
Dec 2024
Oct 2024
Apr 2019
Dec 2018
3 Dec · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned- " Fire at Reliance rubber plant in Vadodara, three dead". The response from the Company is"As regards your trailing mail about the news item appearing in www.indianexpress.com - Sources dated 30-Nov-2018, titled "Fire at Reliance rubber plant in Vadodara, three dead", we would like to inform that in an unfortunate incident Thursday morning, a fire broke out in PBR2 plant of the Vadodara complex. The fire was restricted to one section of the plant and timely action by Reliance firefighting team helped in quickly extinguishing the fire. Unfortunately, three contract workers who were injured latter succumbed to injuries, despite the best efforts of the medical team. Our prayers and sympathies are with their families in their time of grief and will support the family to overcome their personal tragedy. While an investigation will be conducted to ascertain the reasons of the fire, the rest of the complex is continuing with normal operations.".3 Dec · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned- " Fire at Reliance rubber plant in Vadodara, three dead". In this regard, you are advised to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order. b) The material impact of this article on the Company. c) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under Regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. If so, you are advised to provide the said information and the reasons for not disclosing the same to the Exchange earlier as required under Regulation 30 of the Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Sep 2018
Aug 2018
17 Aug · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with respect to announcement dated 15-Aug-2018, regarding Intimation under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 - Short shutdown of one of the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units (FCCU) at Jamnagar complex. On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. Amount & percentage of turnover or revenue or income and net worth of the listed entity contributed by such unit or division during the last financial year;The response of the Company is awaited.
Jun 2018
6 Jun · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned- "Had no option but to file defamation suit against COAI, says JIO". The response from the Company is as follow- With regard to your trailing mail on news item appearing in The Economic Times, titled "Had no option but to file defamation suit against COAI, says JIO", we would like to inform you that the news is about a subsidiary of the Company viz. Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited ( RJIL). RJIL has filed a suit for damages against COAI and its Director General, Mr Rajan Mathews, in the Hon ble Delhi High Court for making maliciously false, disparaging and defamatory statements against it over a period of time. The Hon ble Delhi High Court, in its Order dated May 30, 2018, after referring to certain words used by COAI and its Director General, Mr Rajan Mathews, in the past, has restrained them from making disparaging and defamatory statements against RJIL. The Hon ble High Court has listed the matter for further hearing in August 2018. Since the matter is sub-judice, it would not be appropriate for the Company to make any further statements on the matter. The Company is committed to making appropriate disclosures to the Exchanges promptly, as required under the SEBI Listing Regulations.5 Jun · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captionedHad no option but to file defamation suit against COAI, says JIOIn this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
May 2018
24 May · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned- "RIL, Shell, ONGC told to pay dollar3.8bn as Govt share of PMT" In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Apr 2018
9 Apr · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned- " KG-D6 Block- RIL told to surrender two deep-sea finds" In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Nov 2017
24 Nov · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "High Court refuses to stay probe in RIL gas price issue". The response from the Company is as follows- a) Whether such event stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order. 1. The Anti-Corruption Bureau ( ACB) of the National Capital Territory of Delhi on 14 February 2014, registered a case against office bearers of the Central Government and Reliance Industries Limited ( RIL) without any investigations. 2. RIL filed a Writ Petition in 2014 before the Delhi High Court challenging this action and impugned notifications which were wrongly relied upon by ACB as conferring jurisdiction upon ACB. This Writ Petition is pending before single judge of Delhi High Court with a direction that no coercive steps shall be taken by ACB. 3. A Division Bench of Delhi High Court vide its judgment dated 4 August 2016, has held that ACB of NCT of Delhi does not have jurisdiction to investigate charges against Central Government employees. The Delhi Government has filed a Special Leave Petition ( SLP) before the Supreme Court which is being heard by the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court. 4. In view of the judgment of Division Bench of the Delhi High Court defining the jurisdiction of ACB, RIL filed for an application to expedite the hearing of RIL Writ Petition and stay of investigation by ACB. The said applications were listed for hearing before Mr Justice AK Chawla of Delhi High Court on 22 November 2017. 5. During the hearing on 22 November 2017, the Court observed that since the Constitutional Bench of Supreme Court is already hearing the underlying legal issue, it may be prudent to await decision of the Supreme Court and did not grant a stay of further investigation by ACB. 6. The matter has been adjourned to 6 December 2017. b) The material impact of this article on the Company. There is no impact of the article on the Company. c) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under Regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. If so, you are advised to provide the said information and the reasons for not disclosing the same to the Exchange earlier as required under Regulation 30 of the Listing Regulations- None.23 Nov · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned High Court refuses to stay probe in RIL gas price issue. In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Aug 2017
16 Aug · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "Govt slaps Rs.1,700-cr penalty on RIL, BP". In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Jul 2017
26 Jul · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "BKC convention center: RIL defaulted on Rs 1369 cr fine & additional surcharge, says govt". In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.18 Jul · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "RIL, Shell, ONGC asked to pay $3 billion in penalty". In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Nov 2016
25 Nov · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from the Company with respect to recent news item captioned Fire at RIL plant unit leaves 2 dead, 6 injured. In this regard, Company vide email dated November 25, 2016 informed the Exchange that there was an unfortunate flash fire in one of the units under a planned maintenance shutdown in our DTA refinery at Jamnagar. While the Reliance fire brigade extinguished the fire swiftly, this has resulted in injuries to 8 contract workers, who are being provided necessary medical treatment. Inspite of timely medical help provided by Reliance medical staff, unfortunately two of them succumbed to their injuries. All operations of the refinery continue to be normal. Further, incidence has no impact on the operations of the Company.25 Nov · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to recent news item captioned Fire at RIL plant unit leaves 2 dead, 6 injured. In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Aug 2016
May 2015
13 May · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Strike at RIL's Patalganga factory on wage issue". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
Mar 2015
20 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "RIL Considering Acquisition of SUN tv". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.9 Mar · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with respect to a news item captioned "RIL's arrested manager Shailesh Saxena has allegedly named the company's president (corporate affairs) Shankar Adawal as the receiver of the leaked papers". The Company has clarified that "Reliance complies with all laws and has no tolerance for any of the acts referred to in the media reports. We are investigating matter internally and will inform all stakeholders of further developments".3 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Reliance, BP report eight oil finds in Cambay block". The Company has clarified that "Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) has been awarded the block CB-ONN-2003/1 with the Operatorship under NELP-V with 100% Participating Interest (PI). The Production Sharing Contract (PSC) is effective from 5th June 2006. RIL has assigned 30% PI to BP Exploration (Alpha) Ltd (BPEAL) during August 2011 and has 70% PI with Operatorship in the block. RIL has made 8 oil discoveries in the block in the period November 09, 2009 to August 03, 2010 during Phase-I exploration period and the same was notified to the DGH / MOPNG. These oil discoveries were named as D-43, D-45, D-46, D-47, D-48, D-49, D-50 and D-51 and were disclosed in our media release at that time. The significant milestone of such discoveries is the approval of Development Plan which is yet to take place".3 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Reliance, BP report eight oil finds in Cambay block". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.2 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "RIL's arrested manager Shailesh Saxena has allegedly named the company's president (corporate affairs) Shankar Adawal as the receiver of the leaked papers". In this regard the Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation in respect of the above media report whether the said information is true and whether the said media report would have any impact on the operations of the Company.
Feb 2015
25 Feb · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Reliance Industries Limited with reference to recent media reports on "Corporate Espionage". In this regard the Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation in respect of the above media report whether the said information is true and whether the said media report would have any impact on the operations of the Company.