Maruti Suzuki India share news, announcements and annual reports
NSE: MARUTIBSE: 532500AutomobilesLarge Cap
Maruti Suzuki India Limited · Formerly Maruti Udyog · Face value ₹5 Face value. The nominal value of one share as the company issued it, the unit its share capital is counted in and a dividend can be stated as a percentage of; it has no link to the share price. Face value in the glossary · Listed Jul 2003
Last close ₹11,397.00down ₹29.00 (0.25%)BSE ₹11,413.00
Share price at the NSE close on 30 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹11,426.00.
30 Oct: open ₹11,430.00, high ₹11,473.00, low ₹11,342.00
52-week range of traded prices to 30 Oct 2026
₹10,985.00Low, 22 Oct 2026₹17,370.00High, 5 Jan 2026
- Market capMarket capitalisation. Share price times the number of shares: what the whole company is worth at the day's price. The rank is by average market value over the six months to Jun 2026, among listed companies. Market capitalisation: how it is worked out
- ₹3,58,325 Cr12th largest listed
- P/EPrice to earnings, trailing. Market cap divided by the profit of the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, after the share of the other owners of its subsidiaries: what investors pay for each rupee of a year's profit. Price to earnings, trailing: how it is worked out
- 26.64
- P/BPrice to book. Market cap divided by the net worth that belongs to the company's own shareholders, its assets less everything it owes and less the other owners' share of its subsidiaries, on its latest balance sheet. Price to book: how it is worked out
- 3.29
- Dividend yieldDividend yield. Dividends paid per share in the twelve months to the day, as a percentage of the day's share price.
- 1.23%
- ROEReturn on equity. Profit over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, as a percentage of their net worth, the money they have in the business. Net worth is the average of the latest balance sheet and the one a year before it.
- 12.9%
- ROCEReturn on capital employed. Operating profit after depreciation (revenue less operating expenses and depreciation, without other income and one-off items) as a percentage of all the money the business runs on: the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included, plus borrowings. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. The profit is over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly); net worth and borrowings are on the latest balance sheet.
- 12.5%
- Debt to equityDebt to equity. Borrowings divided by the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included: rupees borrowed for each rupee of equity in the business. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. From the balance sheet at the end of Sep 2026.
- 0.00
- Volume, NSEVolume. Shares traded on the last trading day; delivery is the part buyers kept rather than sold again the same day. Volume in the glossary
- 2,80,44850.6% delivered
Maruti Suzuki India disputes and clarifications
25 filed, newest first.
Oct 2026
15 Oct · Legal
Sep 2026
30 Sep · Legal
Jul 2026
7 Jul · Legal
Jun 2026
30 Jun · Legal
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Aug 2025
4 Aug · Legal
Mar 2025
Jan 2025
28 Jan · Legal
Oct 2024
23 Oct · Legal
Jan 2024
10 Jan · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to announcement dated 26-Dec-2023, regarding Appointment of Mr. Kazunari Yamaguchi as Non- Executive Director of the company w.e.f. January 02, 2024. On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. Affirmation that the person appointed as Director is not debarred from holding the office by virtue of any SEBI Order or any other authority. The response of the Company is awaited.
Dec 2021
10 Dec · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to announcement dated 23-Nov-2021, regarding 'Order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) '. On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. Expected financial implications, if any, due to compensation, penalty etc; 2. Quantum of claims, if any The response of the Company is awaited.
Apr 2020
16 Apr · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to announcement dated 01-Apr-2020, regarding "Cessation of Ms Renu Sud Karnad as Independent Director of the company w.e.f. March 31, 2020". On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. No other material reasons other than providedThe response of the Company is awaited.
Dec 2014
10 Dec · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Maruti bags army order for 4,000 Gypsys, its largest yet". The Company has clarified that "The Company has received an order for supply of 4141 Gypsy vehicles from the Indian Army in the ordinary course of business. The Company sells about 12 Lac vehicles per annum with a turnover close to Rs. 45,000 Crore. Keeping in view such a large scale of operations of the Company, this particular order is approximately 0.34% of the total number of vehicles sold by the Company in a year. Further, over the last 30 years or so, the Company, from time to time, has been supplying Gypsy to Army & other para security forces. Hence, this event is neither unprecedented nor material enough to have a bearing on the operations/performance of the Company".8 Dec · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Maruti bags army order for 4,000 Gypsys, its largest yet". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
Oct 2014
27 Oct · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to a news item captioned "MFs dig in for fight on Maruti's Gujarat plant". The Company has clarified that "We have already informed the Stock Exchanges in March-14 that the Board has approved that a 100% Suzuki subsidiary should make the investment in establishing new manufacturing facilities in Gujarat. The details of the Company, and how the investment would be financed were also made public. The Suzuki subsidiary would enter into an exclusive contract for manufacturing cars for MSIL and that in accordance with Section 188 of the New Company s Act, we will be putting up this proposal for shareholder voting. In pursuance of this voting, on June 06, 2014, we put up a presentation, meant for investors, highlighting the salient features of the proposed contract manufacturing arrangement in the public domain through the stock exchanges and the Company s Website. The benefits of the arrangement to MSIL were highlighted in this presentation. Subsequent to this, we met our institutional shareholders and proxy advisory firms and explained the merits of the proposed arrangement for Gujarat and answered their questions, and gave clarifications. No further information was shared and there has been no event / negotiation as referred in your email / the Business Standard article. It is also pertinent to clarify that the article in Business Standard mentions some points which are factually incorrect. For instance, the article states The Company has, however, maintained the move will only result in reducing the cost of manufacturing its cars . The fact is the Company has never stated this at all. What the Company has stated is that this arrangement will result in our making the same profit as we would have made if we had invested our money, with an additional treasury income arising from our not having to invest our money. This would mean higher returns on investment as compared to the option of the Company investing its own funds in Gujarat capacity. There is also a mention in the Business Standard article of the company "...get (ting) into distribution instead of the complete value chain . A Car company to be successful has to carry out several functions like R&D, product development, sourcing, manufacturing, sales, service and supply of after-market parts. Manufacturing alone cannot ensure the success of a car company in the market as can be seen from the market shares in India of some car manufacturing giants of the world. For most of these companies, a limited sales and service network has been the most decisive factor for their market position. Also, there is no car company in the world to our knowledge that does the complete value chain itself. On the contrary most car companies in the world and India have a high level of outsourcing of manufacturing; generally three-fourths of the car by value is outsourced".22 Oct · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "MFs dig in for fight on Maruti's Gujarat plant". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
Aug 2014
26 Aug · Legal
Exchange sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to news item captioned "Competition panel slaps Rs. 2,545 cr fine on carmakers". The Companny has clarified that "The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has come out with its final order late last evening with respect to the investigation against 17 car manufacturers in India. As per the order, the car manufactures are found indulging in anti competitive conduct and abuse of dominant position, which is in violation of Section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act 2002. However, at the outset the final order of CCI would not impact Maruti Suzuki India Limited at this juncture as the Delhi High Court vide its order dated 29.04.2013 and 13.08.2014 that the final order of the CCI shall not be given effect to till after expiry of 10 days from either the vacation of stay Order dated 06.02.2013 of the Madras High Court or issuance of a final order in the Writ Petition before the Madras High Court. Meanwhile after examining the final order of CCI, we shall be taking necessary legal steps as advised by our advocates. As per the final order of CCI, it has directed Maruti Suzuki India Limited to do certain compliances in order to stop the anti-competitive activities allegedly carried out by Maruti Suzuki India Limited and has further imposed a fine of INR 471.14 Crores. Maruti Suzuki will explore all legal options in the light of the CCI Order. It is pertinent to note that as per the order of Delhi High Court dated 29-04-2013, the final order of CCI would apply to Maruti Suzuki after the expiry of a period of 10 days from the final order in the Writ Petition before the Madras High Court, which is still pending".
Apr 2014
Jan 2014
30 Jan · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Maruti to rework deal with Gujarat". The Company has clarified that "The Company would be required to initiate and do several executive actions before consummating the transaction. The responsibility of undertaking these actions is of the management of the Company. After all requisite actions are concluded, the same would be put up before the board as well as shareholders, if required.9 Jan · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Maruti Suzuki India Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Maruti shares surge on buzz parent may hike its stake". The Company has clarified that "We are in no position to comment on the contents of the Article in question as the matter has never been placed before the board of directors of the Company".
Dec 2013
20 Dec · Legal
Maruti Suzuki India Limited has given clarification to the Exchange regarding news item appearing in print media dated December 20, 2013 titled "Suzuki likely to press the pedal on Maruti stake" & "Japanese Auto major Suzuki Motor Corporation (SMC) is considering increasing its stake in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd". The Company has stated that they are in no position to comment on the contents of the Article in question as the matter has never been placed before the Board of Directors of the Company.