PVR INOX logo

PVR INOX share news, announcements and annual reports

NSE: PVRINOXBSE: 532689EntertainmentSmall Cap

PVR INOX Limited · Formerly PVR · Face value ₹10 · Listed Jan 2006
Last close ₹1,490.30up ₹45.00 (3.11%)BSE ₹1,488.30

Share price at the NSE close on 29 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹1,445.30.

29 Oct: open ₹1,448.70, high ₹1,515.00, low ₹1,440.30

52-week range of traded prices to 29 Oct 2026
₹907.40Low, 30 Mar 2026₹1,518.00High, 28 Oct 2026
Market cap
₹14,326 Cr569th largest listed
P/E
23.80
P/E without one-offs
29.87
P/B
1.94
Dividend yield
Nonein the last 12 months
ROE
8.3%
ROE without one-offs
6.6%
ROCE
14.1%
Debt to equity
0.07
Volume, NSE
16,65,88335.5% delivered

PVR INOX disputes and clarifications

27 filed, newest first.

  1. Oct 2025

  2. Aug 2023

  3. Jun 2022

  4. May 2022

    • 10 May · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from PVR Limited with respect to announcement dated 09-May-2022 informing about Outcome of Board Meeting.On the basis of aforesaid announcement, the Company is required to provide/clarify the following:Change in directors, key managerial personnel (Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Company Secretary etc.), Auditor and Compliance Officer: 1. Brief profile (in case of appointment) The response of the company is awaited.
  5. Feb 2022

  6. Jan 2022

    • 29 Jan · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from PVR Limited with respect to announcement dated 21-Jan-2022, regarding approval of employee stock option plan in the Board meeting held on January 21, 2022. On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. Whether the scheme is in terms of SEBI (SBEBSE) Regulations, 2021 (if applicable);2. Total number of shares covered by these options;3. Pricing formula;4. Brief details of significant terms;The response of the Company is awaited.
  7. Sep 2019

  8. Aug 2017

  9. Jul 2017

    • 27 Jul · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from PVR Limited with respect to announcement dated 26-Jul-2017, regarding "Outcome of Board Meeting held on July 26, 2017." On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. Brief profile (in case of appointment);The response of the Company is awaited.
  10. Jun 2017

  11. May 2017

    • 31 May · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from PVR Limited with respect to announcement dated 30-May-2017, regarding Outcome of Board Meeting held on May 30, 2017.On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. Date of appointment/cessation (as applicable) & term of appointment;2. Brief profile (in case of appointment);3. Disclosure of relationships between directors (in case of appointment of a director).The response of the Company is awaited.
  12. Sep 2016

  13. Aug 2015

  14. Jul 2015

  15. May 2015

  16. Mar 2015

  17. Jan 2015

  18. Dec 2014

    • 1 Dec · Legal

      Exchange has sought clarification from PVR Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "PVR in negotiations to acquire SPI Cinemas". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
  19. Dec 2012

  20. Sep 2010

  21. Jan 2008

    • 2 Jan · Legal

      Vide its letter dated December 31, 2007 that "This has reference to the news item published today in the Business Standard about PVR Starbucks tie-up. In this connection we wish to clarify that the PVR has not entered into any agreement or tie up with Starbucks for retailing their products whereas PVR is only procuring one of Starbucks pre-packaged products i.e. flavored cold coffee from one of its importer/ distributor based in Mumbai for selling at our cinemas in Mumbai and Delhi. The journalist/ reporter who has met our Mr. Ranjan Singh has wrongly conceived our procurement and selling of Starbucks' products at our cinemas as our tie-up with Starbucks. We further wish to clarify that the products are not being imported from US as reported in the newspaper but are procured from a source based in India".