63 moons technologies share news, announcements and annual reports
NSE: 63MOONSBSE: 526881IT - SoftwareSmall Cap
63 moons technologies limited · Formerly Financial Technologies (India) · Face value ₹2 Face value. The nominal value of one share as the company issued it, the unit its share capital is counted in and a dividend can be stated as a percentage of; it has no link to the share price. Face value in the glossary · Listed Apr 1995 on BSE, Jun 2005 on NSE
Last close ₹932.50up ₹22.45 (2.47%)BSE ₹933.25
Share price at the NSE close on 28 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹910.05.
28 Oct: open ₹910.05, high ₹947.30, low ₹899.65
52-week range of traded prices to 28 Oct 2026
₹467.00Low, 30 Mar 2026₹957.95High, 3 Aug 2026
- Next results date: the board meets on 4 Nov 2026 to consider: financial results. The notice · Results calendar
- Market capMarket capitalisation. Share price times the number of shares: what the whole company is worth at the day's price. The rank is by average market value over the six months to Jun 2026, among listed companies. Market capitalisation: how it is worked out
- ₹4,297 Cr985th largest listed
- P/EPrice to earnings, trailing. Market cap divided by the profit of the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, after the share of the other owners of its subsidiaries: what investors pay for each rupee of a year's profit. Price to earnings, trailing: how it is worked out
- Earlier quarters restated in the year
- P/BPrice to book. Market cap divided by the net worth that belongs to the company's own shareholders, its assets less everything it owes and less the other owners' share of its subsidiaries, on its latest balance sheet. Price to book: how it is worked out
- 1.21
- Dividend yieldDividend yield. Dividends paid per share in the twelve months to the day, as a percentage of the day's share price.
- 0.21%
- ROCEReturn on capital employed. Operating profit after depreciation (revenue less operating expenses and depreciation, without other income and one-off items) as a percentage of all the money the business runs on: the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included, plus borrowings. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. The profit is over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly); net worth and borrowings are on the latest balance sheet.
- −9.1%
- Debt to equityDebt to equity. Borrowings divided by the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included: rupees borrowed for each rupee of equity in the business. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. From the balance sheet at the end of Mar 2026.
- 0.00
- Volume, NSEVolume. Shares traded on the last trading day; delivery is the part buyers kept rather than sold again the same day. Volume in the glossary
- 4,92,68352.6% delivered
63 moons technologies disputes and clarifications
68 filed, newest first. Page 1 of 2.
Feb 2026
10 Feb · Legal
The exchange asked on 9 Feb 2026
Oct 2024
16 Oct · Legal
The exchange asked on 15 Oct 2024
Jul 2023
3 Jul · Legal
The exchange asked on 30 Jun 2023
Jun 2020
11 Jun · Legal
The exchange asked on 10 Jun 2020
Mar 2020
24 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from 63 moons technologies limited with respect to announcement dated 17-Mar-2020, regarding Change in Director(s) of the company. On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. Brief profile of nominee directors The response of the Company is awaited.
Aug 2019
27 Aug · Legal
The exchange asked on 26 Aug 2019
May 2019
7 May · Legal
The exchange asked on 6 May 2019
Apr 2019
18 Apr · Legal
The exchange asked on 18 Apr 2019
Feb 2019
1 Feb · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from 63 moons technologies limited with respect to announcement dated 30-Jan-2019, a press release dated January 30, 2019, titled "Hon'ble Supreme Court disposed SLP of NIAG & Maharashtra Government".". On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following: 1. In the event of settlement of the proceedings, details of such settlement including - terms of the settlement, compensation/penalty paid (if any) and impact of such settlement on the financial position of the listed entity.2. In the case of litigation against key management personnel or its promoter or ultimate person in control, regularly provide details of any change in the status and / or any development in relation to such proceedings;The response of the Company is awaited.
Dec 2018
Nov 2018
21 Nov · Legal
Significant increase in volume has been observed in 63 moons technologies limited. The Exchange, in order to ensure that investors have latest relevant information about the company and to inform the market place so that the interest of the investors is safeguarded, has written to the company. The response from the company is awaited.
Oct 2018
Sep 2018
26 Sep · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned- SFIO asks for delisting of 63 Moons Technologies. In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Jun 2018
11 Jun · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captionedNCLT declares Jignesh Shah, 9 others unfit to be directors of 63 MoonsIn this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Mar 2018
23 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned- "CBI conducts raids at Jignesh Shah premises, 63 Moons office in relation to MCX IPO case" In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.16 Mar · Legal
The exchange asked on 15 Mar 2018
Jan 2018
25 Jan · Legal
The exchange asked on 24 Jan 2018
Dec 2017
26 Dec · Legal
The exchange asked on 22 Dec 2017
Aug 2017
2 Aug · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from the Company with respect to news item captioned "SEBI Order-In the matter of the Insider Trading in the Scrip of 63 Moons Technologies". In this regard, Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company is aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Oct 2016
17 Oct · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to announcement dated 14-Oct-2016, regarding "Mr. Anil Singhvi, Non-Executive Director has resigned from the Board of the Company and the same has been accepted by the Board at its meeting held on October 14, 2016. Further Mr. Suresh Salvi (Ret. IAS) has been appointed as Non-Executive Director to fill up the casual vacancy which has been created due to the resignation of Mr. Anil Singhvi."On basis of above the Company is required to clarify following:1. Date of appointment/cessation (as applicable) & term of appointment;2. Disclosure of relationships between directors (in case of appointment of a director).The response of the Company is awaited.3 Oct · Legal
Jul 2016
28 Jul · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned 'No HC relief to attachment of FTIL bank accounts by EOW . In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.21 Jul · Legal
The exchange asked on 21 Jul 2016
19 Jul · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item of 19-July-16 appeared on channel ET Now, titled Mumbai police attaches assets of Financial Technology. It is incumbent upon the Exchanges in such situations to attempt to verify the accuracy or otherwise of the information reported and to disseminate to the market place the clarification/information furnished by the company.In this regard, you are advised to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following:a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company.b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under Regulation 30 of Listing Regulations. If so, you are advised to provide the said information and the reasons for not disclosing the same to the Exchange earlier as required under regulation 30 of the Listing regulations.As per regulation 30 of the Listing regulations, all listed companies are required to intimate to the Exchanges all the events, information etc. that have bearing on the operation/ performance of the company which include all price sensitive information, etc. In addition, all listed companies are also required to furnish to the Exchanges on request, such information concerning the company as may be reasonably required.The response from the Company is awaited.
Apr 2016
20 Apr · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to increase in the volume of its security. The Exchange, in order to ensure that investors have latest relevant information about the company and to inform the market place so that the interest of the investors is safeguarded, had written to the company. Financial Technologies (India) Limited has stated that "No such announcement is pending at our end"
Mar 2016
22 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Stay extend on FTIL-NSEL merger '. In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Feb 2016
19 Feb · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Bombay High court puts on hold FTIL-NSEL Merger". The Company, has vide email dated February 19, 2016 stated 'Please note that the Hon ble Bombay High Court has extended the stay on Final Order till March 31, 2016.It may be recollected that as per the Hon ble Bombay High Court Order dated February 04, 2015, any adverse Order would be automatically stayed for a period of two weeks.The next listing date of the matter is March 17, 2016. FTIL is required to place its challenge to the Final Order before the Hon ble Bombay High Court by amending the existing Writ Petition or by filing a fresh Petition on or before March 15, 2016.As the Order passed by the Hon ble Bombay High Court on February 16, 2016, is not uploaded on the website of the High Court, there was no cause to intimate the Stock Exchanges before the Order was made available to FTIL'17 Feb · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Bombay High court puts on hold FTIL-NSEL Merger ". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under regulation 30 of Listing regulations. The response from the Company is awaited.
Jun 2015
30 Jun · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to a news item captioned "CLB freezes assets of FTIL, Protects Interest Of Govt." The Company has clarified that "We are yet to receive the copy of the CLB Order and hence we would not be able to comment on the above news item which was aired on news channel".30 Jun · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "CLB freezes assets of FTIL, Protects Interest Of Govt". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
Apr 2015
1 Apr · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Brokers, investors reject FTIL settlement plan". The Company has clarified that "The proposal has been issued on a Without Prejudice basis which cannot and should not be construed as an acceptance by FTIL of any liability towards any trading client or their brokers or otherwise. FTIL reserves the right to pursue legal remedies and recourse and nothing contained in the proposal shall have the effect of diluting or impinging any of FTIL's rights, contentions and submissions in any proceedings before any authority, whether pending or otherwise. As a responsible corporate and as a matter of good corporate governance practice, any price sensitive information pertaining to operations or performance of the Company, or such other information as required under Clause 36 of the Listing Agreement, will be first notified to the Stock Exchanges to comply with the Listing Agreement".1 Apr · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Brokers, investors reject FTIL settlement plan". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
Mar 2015
18 Mar · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to a news item captioned "HC Rules Against FTIL Petition". The Company has clarified that "Please refer our communication dated March 01, 2015, wherein it is stated that the Company will file a petition before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court or Company law Board or at any other appropriate forum as it deems fit, to strongly oppose the Ministry Of Corporate Affair's (MCA) petition to Company law Board. The Media reporting is on the aforesaid matter and we do not wish to further comment on the same".18 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "HC Rules Against FTIL Petition". In this regard the Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation in respect of the above media report whether the said media report would have any impact on the operations of the Company.13 Mar · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Draft order on FTIL-NSEL merger: HC vacates status quo". The Company has clarified that "The Company vide its various communications has intimated to the stock exchanges from time to time in the above referred matter. Further, please refer our communication dated February 05, 2015, wherein, we have forwarded the Un-audited financial results of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. Note no. 10 of the financial results discloses a brief Note on your above referred matter. The results were also published in the news-papers alongwith the Notes, which is sufficient disclosure to the stock exchanges and investors at large.13 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Draft order on FTIL-NSEL merger: HC vacates status quo". In this regard the Exchange has advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation in respect of the above media report whether the said information is true and whether the said media report would have any impact on the operations of the Company.4 Mar · Legal
Exchange had sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to a news item captioned "Fin Tech cant make 3rd party rights On Assets W/o Prior EOW Nod". The Company has clarified as follows: a) During the course of investigation, it is revealed that FTIL had received Rs.84 crores from NSEL, which is investor s money and directed to earmark this amount and furnish the particulars of Bank Account wherein this amount is deposited. On this, it is hereby clarified that Rs.84 crores received from NSEL by FTIL is towards technology software, software maintenance & support services rendered by FTIL to NSEL and is not the so called Investor s money. Further, without prejudice to its rights and contention, besides investment of Rs.57 crores as Equity Share Capital in NSEL, FTIL has provided to NSEL Rs.179.4 crores as a Bridge Loan which has been utilized by NSEL for paying the small investors in full whose dues were upto Rs.2 lakhs and 50% of the amount to those , whose dues were between Rs.2 lakhs and Rs.10 lakhs b) Not to dispose of, alienate, encumber, part with possession of or create any third party right, title and/or interest in, to, upon or in respect of any of assets of Financial Technologies (India) Limited, its subsidiaries and its step down subsidiaries, except for the payment of statutory dues, amounts for the preservation, maintenance and protection of their assets and wages and salaries under intimation to the Investigating agency and in the case of immovable properties, without the orders of the trial Court. The Company is seeking legal advice on the aforesaid letter from EOW.3 Mar · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "Fin Tech cant make 3rd party rights On Assets W/o Prior EOW Nod". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.
Dec 2014
12 Dec · Legal
Exchange, on December 4, 2014, had sought following clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to an announcement sent by the Company on November 26, 2014; 1) How 'extinguished warrants' were sold to the investors mentioned in the disclosure dated November 26, 2014 and the legality of the said action by you. The Company has clarified that We have communicated to you vide our letter date August 25, 2014 inter alia stating that the Company will take appropriate legal steps. Accordingly, the Company wrote to SEBI and also challenged before SAT the legality of the action taken by MCX-SX, when the Company was already in the process of divesting its entire stake including warrants of MCX-SX. As intimated to you vide our letter dated November 25, 2014, the Company has entered into the Warrant Purchase Agreement with the Purchasers as referred in your mail, subject to certain terms and conditions, one of the conditions was subject to MCX-SX repealing the extinguishment of warrants. MCX-SX, vide its letter dated December 4, 2014 has communicated that the warrants has been revived, subject to the condition that the said warrants will be transferred to the purchasers as referred in your mail and the parties shall exercise the rights attached to the warrants in terms of SECC Regulations, 2012 .4 Dec · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to an announcement sent by the Company on November 26, 2014, which stated, that "Financial Technologies (India) Ltd. ("FTIL") entered into a Share and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Dr. Rakesh Jhunjhunwala and separate Warrant Purchase Agreements with M/s. Edelweiss Financial Services Limited, M/s. Trust Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Ms. Viral A. Parikh, M/s. Nemish S. Shah H.U.F., M/s, Derive Investments, Mr. Kalpraj Dharamshi, Mr. Dhanesh Sumatilal Shah, Mr. Uday Shah, Ms. Madhuri Kela, Ms. Renuka Shah, M/s. SKS Capital & Research Pvt. Ltd. and Ms. Madhu Vadera Jayakumar for sale of its 100% stake in MCX-SX comprising of 2,70,00,000 equity shares and 56,24,60,000 warrants for an aggregate consideration of Rs. 88.419 Crores. The said transaction is subject to fulfillment of certain condition precedents including regulatory approvals. Post completion of the above said transaction, the Company would have completely exited MCX-SX." Further it is observed from an earlier announcement made by FTIL on August 25, 2014, wherein the FTIL had forwarded the copy of the letter issued by MCX-SX with a subject "Sale of Shares & Warrants held in MCX-SX". The letter inter-alia stated that Board of MCX-SX had decided to treat the warrants held by FTIL, as extinguished . and the Board decided to transfer an amount of Rs. 56.246 cr standing as non-refundable interest free deposit against such warrants to the capital reserves" and the company had inter-alia stated that the company was " examining the same and will take appropriate steps in due course of time and in the best interest of 60,000 plus shareholders and stakeholders of the Company." In view of the above disclosure made on August 25, 2014, following clarification is sought from the Company : 1) How 'extinguished warrants' were sold to the investors mentioned in the disclosure dated November 26, 2014 and the legality of the said action by you. The response from the Company is awaited.1 Dec · Legal
Exchange has sought clarification from Financial Technologies (India) Limited with respect to recent news item captioned "FTIL Gets Time Till Jan 4 to complete IEX Stake Sale". In this regard, Exchange have advised the Company to provide clarification/confirmation on the news item in detail including the following: a) Whether such event/negotiations/article stated in published news were taking place? If so, you are advised to provide the said information along with the sequence of events in chronological order and the material impact of this article on the Company. b) Whether company are aware of any information that has not been announced to the Exchanges under clause 36 of the Listing Agreement. The response from the Company is awaited.