UTI Mutual Fund logo

UTI BSE Low Volatility Index Fund Direct Growth NAV history

AMFI: 149881ISIN: INF789F1AVF2MUTF_IN: UTI_BSE_LOW_1WER9S7UTI Mutual FundIndex funds

NAV ₹14.8806down ₹0.01 (0.09%)

NAV for 27 Oct 2026, against 26 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Other plans: Regular Growth ₹14.5627, −0.09%

Fund size
₹418 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
0.66%26 Oct 2026
Exit load
None
P/E
24.130 Sep 2026
Risk level
Very HighAug 2026
Holdings
3030 Sep 2026
Launched
3 Mar 2022

UTI BSE Low Volatility Index Fund Direct Growth's NAV is on record for every business day from 7 Mar 2022, when it was ₹9.6388, to 27 Oct 2026. Its highest NAV was ₹18.2369 on 27 Sep 2024.

UTI BSE Low Volatility Index Fund NAV since launch

NAV, ₹ per unit, Direct Growth

Highest NAV ₹18.2369 on 27 Sep 2024Lowest NAV ₹9.5339 on 17 Jun 2022The benchmark, BSE Low Volatility TRI, is not drawn: only its price index is on record, which leaves out the dividends a NAV includes.

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. A year's return is the NAV on its last day against the year before's

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowest
2026so far₹17.3549₹14.8806₹17.6169₹14.8353–
2025₹16.1445₹17.4030₹17.4425₹14.9149+8.17%
2024₹14.5406₹16.0882₹18.2369₹14.5268+10.74%
2023₹11.2066₹14.5273₹14.5273₹10.6923+29.96%
2022₹9.6388₹11.1783₹11.5819₹9.5339–

NAV history of other funds

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.